Thursday, May 21, 2009

Oak Ridge: Big Brother is Awake! Red light cameras in action

Yesterday evening at approximately 8:30, I was driving through Oak Ridge and had come to a stop at the intersection of Illinois Ave. and Robertsville Road - one of four places where the City of Oak Ridge has installed Redflex red light safety revenue cameras.

I saw two motorists make LEGAL right turns on red. The Redflex cameras flashed both of them. I guess they'll be receiving some nastygrams in the mail soon.

ATTENTION OAK RIDGERS AND PEOPLE WHO TRAVEL THROUGH OAK RIDGE:
The "Big Brother" cameras are now ACTIVE in Oak Ridge. They are currently in the initial 30-day period where they only issue "warnings." Starting JUNE 1st, they will begin issuing actual citations instead of warnings.

The "active" cameras:

Intersection of Illinois Ave. and Robertsville Rd. (in front of Robertsville Middle School)
- Monitors red light AND speeding on Illinois Ave.

View Larger Map

Intersection of Oak Ridge Turnpike and Lafayette Dr./New York Ave. (First Baptist Church of Oak Ridge is located at this intersection)
- Monitors red light AND speeding on Oak Ridge Turnpike
- Monitors left turns on red from eastbound Oak Ridge Turnpike to northbound New York Ave
- Monitors right turns on red from westbound Oak Ridge Turnpike to northbound New York Ave

View Larger Map

Soon to be active:
Cameras on Oak Ridge Turnpike in front of Oak Ridge High School

View Larger Map

Cameras on Robertsville Road at Willowbrook School

View Larger Map

Now is the time to familiarize yourself with Tennessee traffic laws if you're in any doubt.

RIGHT TURN ON RED
Unless otherwise posted via a "NO RIGHT TURN ON RED" sign, it is legal to turn right on a red light under the following conditions:
- You have to come to a full and complete stop before turning. No "rolling stops" or simply slowing down.
- You must yield to any pedestrians or other traffic or obstructions.

TENNESSEE CODE ANNOTATED
55-8-198. Citations based on surveillance cameras. —

(a) A traffic citation that is based solely upon evidence obtained from a surveillance camera that has been installed to enforce or monitor traffic violations shall be considered a nonmoving traffic violation.

(b) An employee of the applicable law enforcement office shall review video evidence from a traffic light signal monitoring system and make a determination as to whether a violation has occurred. If a determination is made that a violation has occurred, a notice of violation or a citation shall be sent by first class mail to the registered owner of the vehicle that was captured by the traffic light signal monitoring system. A notice of violation or citation shall allow for payment of the traffic violation or citation within thirty (30) days of the mailing of the notice. No additional penalty or other costs shall be assessed for nonpayment of a traffic violation or citation that is based solely on evidence obtained from a surveillance camera installed to enforce or monitor traffic violations, unless a second notice is sent by first class mail to the registered owner of the motor vehicle and the second notice provides for an additional thirty (30) days for payment of the violation or citation.

(c) The following vehicles are exempt from receiving a notice of violation:
(1) Emergency vehicles with active emergency lights;
(2) Vehicles moving through the intersection to avoid or clear the way for a marked emergency vehicle;
(3) Vehicles under police escort; and
(4) Vehicles in a funeral procession.

(d) (1) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection (d), the registered owner of the motor vehicle shall be responsible for payment of any notice of violation or citation issued as the result of a traffic light monitoring system.

(2) An owner of a vehicle shall not be responsible for the violation if, on or before the designated court date, the owner furnishes the court an affidavit stating the name and address of the person or entity that leased, rented or otherwise had care, custody or control of the motor vehicle at the time of the violation.

(3) If a motor vehicle or its plates were stolen at the time of the alleged violation, the registered owner must provide an affidavit denying the owner was an operator and provide a certified copy of the police report reflecting such theft.

(4) An affidavit alleging theft of a motor vehicle or its plates must be provided by the registered owner of a vehicle receiving a notice of violation within thirty (30) days of the mailing date of the notice of violation.

3 comments:

  1. Thanks for this information. I go through most of these intersections on a daily basis, and while I make it a general practice to follow traffic laws, it is good to know exactly what the revenue cameras are looking for.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have over 300 sites stored on redflex that include many criminal and/ or ethics violations, here are just very few. I am including a few sites so you can see for yourself. Want to know why they can't be beaten in court? If anyone thinks the cameras will go away, you have a better chance at the lottery. Ask yourself what organizations would want to have access to the ability to pull up plate numbers, and tell by simply entering license number, where that vehicle was at given times, even though the vehicles are not in violation, this goes on 24/7. If you passed a number of redflex cameras going across the state of country 3 mos ago they can tell you where and when. Who can get a company using radar that is not legal to be used, passed through the courts with not even a slap on the wrist? Who can get Redflex, and their sister tenix, government contracts without taking any other bids. Why did the present head of Home land security push so hard to get the cameras all over the state, even where they aren't needed? Why contract to a company from Australia that has more liberal incorporation laws to hide any true control, (that also has a partnership with a company in China)? These cameras are for spying on citizens only, there are perks of revenue that can go along to cities and states, who bring them in. To say nothing of added money to campaign coffers of the elected officials. Want to know the very large sums that the camera money provided State Representatives, you will be astonished. The loans and perks to local officials has become just another cost of doing business to redflex. Might want to check on the this judge's ties to redflex or to officials receiving perks from redflex. one second added to yellow knocks redflex out http://news.mywebpal.com/partners/680/public/news954353.html http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/26/2650.asp look for who is getting paid Mayor Healy after he sold his soul to Redflex for the small price of $250 http://www.cantonredlightcameras.com/canton-city-council-deserves-thank-you-standing-redflex-mayor-healy/ Columbus councilman took, disclosed loan from lobbyist http://dispatch.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2009/04/04/craigloan.html?sid=101 check on streaming video Photo Ticket Cameras to Track Drivers Nationwide http://axiomamuse.wordpress.com/2009/04/02/photo-ticket-cameras-to-track-drivers-nationwide/

    ReplyDelete
  3. Listen up Oak Ridge officials. I just payed my nice $50 violation fee. And you'll be happy to know, that under no circumstances, will I ever buy anything in Oak Ridge ever again. No movies, no groceries, notta. Not a dime till you refund the money you essentially stole from me.
    Sincerely,
    Slightly more poor UT student.

    ReplyDelete

Thank you so much for visiting. I appreciate your leaving a comment. Come back and visit anytime!